Legal
Accessibility Statement
What we target, what we have already done, and what still needs work, so you can judge our accessibility for yourself.
SO Labs Inc. builds Ṣọ Email Security. We want people to be able to use our website, our apps, and our documentation, including people who use a screen reader, keyboard-only navigation, magnification, captions, or other assistive technology. This statement is written plainly and it is honest about the gaps. If you are assessing us for procurement, the parts you probably need are Section 04 and Section 05.
01Our Commitment
Email security should not be harder to use for someone who depends on assistive technology. We treat accessibility as part of building the product, not as a separate task at the end.
- ▸We design and build against a published standard rather than a personal opinion of what looks usable.
- ▸We check accessibility when we ship new pages and components, not only during a periodic sweep.
- ▸We tell you what we have tested and what we have not, so you can make your own assessment.
- ▸We treat a reported barrier as a defect and put it in the same queue as any other defect.
02The Standard We Target
We target the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, Level AA. WCAG is the standard most procurement teams and most accessibility laws point to. Level AA is the level normally asked for.
WCAG is built on four principles. Content should be:
- ▸Perceivable. People can take the information in, whether they see it, hear it, or read it through assistive technology.
- ▸Operable. Everything can be reached and used, including with a keyboard alone.
- ▸Understandable. Language, structure, and behaviour are predictable.
- ▸Robust. Content works with current browsers and assistive technology, and keeps working as they change.
Please read WCAG 2.1 Level AA as our working target. It is the bar we build to. It is not a claim of certified conformance, and we say so plainly in Section 04.
03What We Have Done
We have completed an accessibility pass across our marketing site, meaning the public pages such as the home page, product pages, pricing, and these legal pages. The pass covered:
- ▸Semantic structure and landmarks. Proper heading order, and real landmark regions for navigation, main content, and footer, so a screen reader user can move around a page instead of reading it end to end.
- ▸Keyboard navigation and visible focus. Interactive elements can be reached and used with a keyboard, and the focused element is visibly marked so you can see where you are.
- ▸Colour contrast. Text and interface colours were reviewed against the WCAG 2.1 Level AA contrast ratios. This matters on a dark interface like ours, where low contrast is easy to introduce by accident.
- ▸Screen reader labelling. Icons, icon-only buttons, and controls carry accessible names, so they are announced as what they do rather than as an unnamed button. Decorative images are hidden from assistive technology.
- ▸Reduced motion. We respect the operating system setting for reduced motion, so animation is cut back for people who find movement uncomfortable or disorienting.
We also keep our written content in plain English for the same reason we keep it short: it is easier for everyone to follow.
04What We Have Not Done
We would rather be useful than flattering, so here is the honest status.
- ▸No formal third-party audit. We have not commissioned an independent accessibility audit. Everything in Section 03 is our own assessment. We have not published a VPAT or an Accessibility Conformance Report.
- ▸No certified conformance claim. Because there has been no independent audit, we do not claim certified WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance. We target it, we build to it, and we do not assert it as a verified fact.
- ▸The dashboard has not had the same pass. The authenticated dashboard, the part you use after signing in, has not yet been through the pass described in Section 03. Parts of it are likely to fall short of our own target.
- ▸Other surfaces are not formally assessed. Our browser extension, mobile apps, and desktop app have not been through a documented accessibility pass either. We are not claiming they fail, only that we have not assessed them to the same standard and will not imply otherwise.
- ▸Testing coverage is limited. Our testing has not covered every combination of screen reader, browser, and operating system. If a specific combination matters to you, tell us and we will test it.
The authenticated dashboard is next. We will update this page when that work is done rather than in advance of it.
05Known Limitations
These are the gaps we know about today:
- ▸Authenticated dashboard. Some controls, tables, and dialogs in the dashboard may have missing labels, weak contrast, or focus behaviour that does not meet our target. This work is planned and not finished.
- ▸Self-assessment only. Without an independent audit, issues that our own review missed will still be present. Treat our claims as a good faith self-assessment.
- ▸Email content we display. When the product shows you an email, the structure, colours, and images in that email were written by the sender. We cannot control the accessibility of someone else's message.
- ▸Third-party screens. Sign-in screens hosted by Google, Microsoft, or Apple, and payment screens hosted by Stripe, are built and controlled by those providers. Their accessibility is outside our control.
- ▸Documents and downloads. Reports, guides, and other files we publish may not be fully tagged for screen readers. Ask us and we will supply the content in an accessible format.
- ▸Third-party embeds. Where we embed content from another service, that content follows the other service's accessibility, not ours.
06Canadian and Provincial Requirements
- ▸SO Labs Inc. is a Canadian company based in Calgary, Alberta. Accessibility in Canada is set at both the federal and the provincial level, and the rules that apply depend on the organisation and where it operates.
- ▸We take account of the federal Accessible Canada Act and of provincial requirements, including the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), which many of our Ontario customers are themselves subject to.
- ▸We are not certified or registered under any of these laws, and nothing on this page should be read as a compliance certificate. WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the target we work to, and it is the standard those regimes generally point at.
- ▸If your organisation has a specific accessibility obligation you need us to meet, raise it before you buy so we can tell you honestly whether we meet it today.
07Report a Barrier
If something on our site or in our product blocks you, please tell us. Email support@soemailsecurity.com. Reports from users are how most real accessibility problems get found.
It helps if you can include:
- ▸The page address or the screen in the app where the problem happens.
- ▸What you were trying to do, and what happened instead.
- ▸The assistive technology, browser, and operating system you were using, if you know them.
You do not need to use technical language. Describe it however is easiest for you.
Our response commitment. We aim to reply within 5 business days. Our reply will tell you what we found, whether we can fix it, and roughly when. If a fix will take time, we will offer a way to get the same information or complete the same task in the meantime.
Alternative formats. We will provide information from this site, including our legal pages and product documentation, in an alternative format on request, at no charge. Tell us what format works for you and we will do our best to match it.
08Contact and Review
- ▸Accessibility feedback and support: support@soemailsecurity.com
- ▸Procurement and enterprise questions: sales@soemailsecurity.com
- ▸Mailing address: SO Labs Inc., 7909 Flint Rd SE #202 Calgary AB T2H 1G3 Canada
We review this statement when we make significant changes to the site or the product, and we update it as the work in Section 04 is completed. For how we handle personal data, see our Privacy Policy. For the terms that govern use of our services, see our Terms of Service.